POPULATION STUDIES-- Sex-- 01-- Male hormone cycle?

The WebMD site indicates that there IS a male hormone cycle-- that's continuous...

QUOTE
Every day, a man's testes are busy producing millions of sperm. As in the female cycle, the hypothalamus starts the process by secreting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) into the bloodstream. GnRH is released approximately every 90 minutes, triggering the pituitary gland to release both luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) into the bloodstream, which carries the hormones to the testes. Within the testes, LH goes directly to the Leydig cells, which triggers the production of testosterone; FSH goes directly to the Sertoli cells, which triggers the production of sperm. When testosterone levels drop, this tells the hypothalamus to release more GnRH, which tells the pituitary gland to secrete more LH and FSH, which tells the body to make more testosterone and sperm. As we discuss later in this article, this hormonal interrelationship, clinically called the hormonal axis, must be in tip-top shape in order for men to produce enough high-quality sperm to fertilize an egg. Trouble with either the Leydig or Sertoli cells may cause unusually high levels of either LH or FSH or unusually low levels of testosterone. Trouble in the hypothalamus or pituitary glands will cause a breakdown of the entire hormonal axis. In all cases, sperm counts will be low or even nonexistent.
UNQUOTE [+]

I've chosen to view the subject of "sex" as subsumed under "population studies" where is properly belongs. So-called "sex education" is a misnomer and a "self-constructed lie" because sex isn't ABOUT sex-- it's about population. What I've determined is that EVERYTHING that the power of nature has done with sex leads, in one way or another, to population. The attempts by the so-called "sex entertainent" industry to deconstruct sex-- has created problems-- deep problems-- having nothing to do with "morals" per so-- but rather with the quality of life.

Makow makes the point--as do most religions-- that separating sex from "marraige" is a negative thing-- but I think it's more accurate to look at the folly of sex as separate from population-- because marraige is subsumed under population studies too. Population studies is the single most important fundamental reference for sex and marraige-- and everything in between. If you don't consider population in every-- most every-- reference to sex-- you're guilty of misleading the reader-- because EVERY element of sex discussion is potentially stimulating to the male mind-- and that stimulation ought-- by simple code of civlized conduct-- be reminded of the population increase implications.

To this extent, every so-called 'adult magazine" ought to have a page or two or more on population studies, and other over-arching topics-- like something on pregnancy or std's. It's the ripping out of the erotic aspect of sex from the over arching contextual layers that creates endless problems for generations upon generations of guys.. I think the girls have a similar problem because mags like Cosmo or the romance novels don't normally refer to population studies.