MOON HOAX-- epistemological issue-- 01-- detail photos

[+] Here we see a few nice NASA close up photos where Twitmeyer (published on Rense) says there is a swishing of the dust-- to cover up prints. That's hard to see, but it could be I guess.

The more interesting aspect of this to consider, boys and girls-- is that the issue of the moon landings is a matter of epistemology. There are multiple layers of deception going on here and guys like Twitmeyer may not be the ones who are being honest. The moon-landing hoax theorists may be of two types-- honest and dishonest. And of the dishonest ones, we're going to see intentionally dishonest and unintenionally dishonest.

The problem is that the photos are not the best epistemological way to detect the fraud. So anyone who asks you to look at photos might not be on the up and up. Rather than photos, we have more work to do on the actual radiation in outer space. The key feature of the area around the earth IS indeed the division between near space and outer space. Without mentioning that in every reference to a moon landing hoax, we have a potential deciever.

Ultimately, what I find is that I'm a lot more interested in truth than money... and so it makes it hard for me to make "money". But there is a truth about money itself, that makes it even harder. You have to choose, in life, I guess-- whether or not you consider the truth to be interesting or not-- and always prioritize it with respect to money. Learn to write-- like Larouche-- who makes constant contextual references to his content.