BLOGS- Larouche's angle-- bad news

[+] Larouche is pointing out how blogs are destroying people. I suppose it's possible-- the quality of work on most kids blogs is pretty frightening. But I wonder is it the medium that does that-- or something else? I'll look into this a bit more.

QUOTES
The intentionally destructive nature of the sites, has everything to do with the digital nature of cyberspace itself, where anything is allowed, except that which distinguishes man from the beast, human cognition[3].

one has all the ingredients necessary for a youth culture that can be programmed to commit the most horrific and senseless acts imaginable. This programming turned internet “social networking,” is the intended effect of freakish internet Olympians such as Rupert Murdoch and Bill Gates, who each have insisted, at various times, mimicking their controllers in the British Empire, that the human mind is no better, if not worse than, a silicon microchip.

People are going on to Bebo and talking to other teenagers, but it is all going too far and it is ending in bullying and suicides."

This is not only the social milieu of a suicide club, but it is a form of symbol-minded language, and disassociation from reality, only possible on either mind-altering psychedelics, like LSD, or, today’s cyberspace. This is a type of domain for schizophrenic expressions of what Lyndon LaRouche and other specialists would call ontological nominalism.

Not coincidentally, these websites, originated out of MK-Ultra’s Silicon Valley mind control experiments, are programmed to trap the individual addicted to them in this type of psychosis: a non-living digital tomb, a club, where the person’s identity, increasingly digitized, and thus decorticated from human reason, has only one increasingly compelling option available to terminate their living hell.

Popular investigators and media reporters today, in the digital tradition of Sherlock Holmes, actually contribute to the problem, scrambling over each other like bloodhounds for the best sniff of the latest isolated clue. But the stinking elephant in the room goes undetected, i.e., the digital world environment, which these youth locate their souls, and hubris, in.

When you take the various social dynamic aspects together as a one, Durkheim is right on this point, that suicides do not principally depend upon the congenital qualities of each individual; but upon causes exterior to them; that ultimately dominate them. That exterior force in this case, today, is a despairing, existentialist culture, coupled with digital controlling mechanisms, that reinforce and escalate this despair

A pivotal aspect of today’s suicide clubs such as Bebo, beyond the sheer existential thrill of it all, is the use of so-called “Newspeak” language for interacting in the digital world, does not correspond to anything in the real world; but, is perceived to the naïve mind as something that possesses a true relevance to real-life interactions. This creates a battle between two universes, the real and the virtual, intended to foster a type of existentialist schizophrenia.

The natural process of the human mind, when hearing a word ironically situated in a phrase, can take the path of many different ambiguities, especially, if done in a Classically intentional way. The way words are spoken, written, and punctuated, can invoke a plethora of ideas to appear in the mind. T

The anomie of MySpace, Facebook, Bebo, et al. exemplifies this extreme form of “click an object” empiricism, and is abused accordingly as the escaping ground for hedonistic fantasy and infantile emotional rage

What we witness in the victims of this suicide club, is what competent specialists call “mass schizophrenia as a social phenomenon.”

The British Empire’s policy, on the other side, of fostering mass cultural insanity, is driven by the intent to deliberately destroy the classical cultural heritage of western civilization. To wit, that so many individuals, even those of some intelligence, are duped into thinking of today’s synthetic digital cyberspace, as an actual universe of existence.

The alternative to today’s collapsing world is not flight into virtual fantasy, but summoning the courage to be one’s true self; to locate oneself in the ongoing 3,000 year fight against oligarchism in western civilization; and, to expose those agents of the British Empire such as Rupert Murdoch, Bill Gates, and Michael Birch, who would be today’s suicide club Presidents, leading today’s youth to its own personally styled self-destruction.


UNQUOTE


MY COMMENTS--

Notice the phenomenon of "bullying"-- which is interesting-- since I myself am the recipient of "bullying" by some cryonicists in something they call the cryonics anti-defamation committee. The "CADC" can't seem to distinguish between revealing real world names of pseudonyms, along with physical location-- from the arguing over ideas-- which in my case involves contextualizing cryonics within a Classical Humanist framework which the CADC doesn't like. They also don't like me writing about ancient astronauts, zionism and cancer cures on the same blog that I write about cryonics in. So instead of writing their own blog delineating cryonics and arguing for working it as a stand-alone idea in the world-- associated with nothing-- they attack or "bully" me-- this is indicative of a destructive cognition-- probably inherent in the "digital" minds of some cryonicists who might be in the younger age category that were overly subjected to videogames and missed the "reading books" part of growing up through the teen years.

Larouche blames the "digital environment". An interesting hypothesis-- and potentially a problem for me and my blog-- and my online presense. Still, Larouche himself has valuable online presense... so we have to determine the difference between his acittivies and the youth bloggers who have been digitally decorticated. It turns out that the arch enemy is not digital communictions itself, but rather existentialist despari COUPLED with the digital environment.

I would suggest that-- as a working hypothesis-- we view cryonics as a potential field where minds have essentially digitized themselves. Paul Wakfer thinks, for example, of the human being as a "self soverieign" in the context of extreme Libertarianism-- otherwise known as anarchy. This human is in a sense nothing but the equivalent of a pixel on a computer screen. Cryonicists think of the human brain as an assembly of neurons, which are digital units. The entire cryonics thesis is consistent with the digital thinking problem of schizophrenic youth that Larouche refers to. Cryonicists have rejected Classical Humanism for seven years, since I first offered it to them as a group in best known Cryonics journal put out by Alcor and begain writing about Larouche in the cryonics field in 2000.

It doesn't have to be that way, however. Robert Ettinger, the co-founder of the modern cryonics movement along with Ev Cooper, rejects A.I. and uploading based on the idea that a computer cannot replicate the real thing. Ettinger falls far short of being a Classical Humanist but he has that part of it right. Cryonics is based on the idea that human memory and personality are preservable in and potentially recoverable from an hi fidelity vitrified (essentially frozen) state. The REASON that this is so, for cryonicists, however, is due to a line of thought that is essentially digital-- because the essence of the unique cognition of man has not yet been specified and may indeed depend on more than the internal structure of the mass of neurons that comprise the human brain. I'm suggesting the human brain as a transducer, here. It's concievable that what we are in fact preserving in cryonics is the transducer itself which produces the "soul" effect-- the unique cognition of man.

Cryonicists believe that man is nothing more than a "super-animal"-- they don't recognize the unique principle discovering cognitive abilities of man as distinct from any higher animal. They see the human brain and mind as simply a continuation of what animals already have, rather than having the distinct property of "human" cognition in Dei Imagio-- that can transform the universe and command the universe to obey the application of discovered principles... something no animal can do.

In a sense, cryonicists effectively trapped themselves inside the "digital mind" long before the blogs appeared in the 1990s and 2000's. Their unique angle on that derived from the "artificial intelligence" fad-- and it is this angle that Ettinger rejects-- which now becomes an essential character trait of Ettinger that needs to be looked at further. Ettinger himself has porposed a "self curcuit" which is the hypothetical unit of human cognition but I don't know if he distinguishes it from the animal's self circuit. I don't believe he does-- but this is an area that a cryonics philosopher would do well to look into.

To be sure, cryonics today is dominated by digital minds that have no regard for analog views like Classical Humanism. I'd like to change that and provide that alternative-- and to make it SAFE to be that way-- which it is not, at this time. I've been banned from all cryonics forums and continue to be threatened as I publish this blog. The mission of analog minds must be to counteract the digital minded humans, however, on a constant basis-- simply as a means for the survival of civilization. Man does not live by digital mind alone. Analog Jesus might today have been quoted as having said that.

The question for me-- today-- is-- in light of this-- do I stop blogging or do I continue? This is a major issue for me because I do indeed have an analog life that needs serious tending to. I might-- I just might-- make a radical choice and swear off the digitizing of my mind through this blog and most internet work. Getting back to pure analog space might be just what I need. I'm sure the CADC would be thrilled with that if I made that move. I would EVEN cancel my internet service, not use my computer AND cancel cable tv etc. I would be analog-man, again. Maybe THAT is progresss! (??).