MOON HOAX-- radiation-- 01-- main argument against

I think my main argument against the moon landings will be space radiation in 2008. It appears to me that outer space is so full of radiation that a human beyond the Van Allen belt would be killed. I think we're trapped on Earth. I think that the moon landings were faked-- but that essential idea about that is not that Apollo was a hoax but that the REASON it was a hoax is a much BIGGER problem-- in that "outer space" is closed off to us currently-- due to radiation.

Now-- once you're beyond the reach of the Sun, you've got intersteller radiation to deal with-- and I don't know what we're dealing with there. Join me in an exploration of the Electric and Radiating Universe-- ERU-- a "new" space venture-- initiated by me here-- that looks beyond the Apollo hoax-- which I now see as a "debate" that is, itself, a hoax (witness Fox again).

The new subject header here will be SPACE-- radiation frontier-- ... since outer space (outer meaning beyond the van allen belts)-- is literally a sea of electric charges AND radiation-- and it's much more important than the moon right now-- especially in this solar system with the sun only 93 million miles away....

Inside the van allen belt (the new beltway)-- it's a different story. I think we can survive up to about 60 miles high but not much more-- and so what we have is a situation where we're trapped on and near Earth for now-- and the political power systems are vying for domination of that because they know that we can't go beyond that for now (possibly centuries)... That's my working hypothesis right now.
[+] Space rad
[+]

PS-- that's not to say we can't send machines out further-- even weaponry-- but the idea of man out there doesn't fly.

Space radiation