CIRCUMCISION-- 01-- new theory by me

Circumcisions in the USA and Canada reached a peak on a bell curve roughly from the early 1900s to the mid 1970's-- and they've abated since then, gradually. It was shocking to me to learn that I was a victim of a practise that is abating-- and that despite continued propaganda in favor of circumcision (genital mutilation that removes the frenum gland and other organs including the entire foreskin, leaving the penis openly exposed-- making it lose percentage of structure and function)-- there continues to be a larger and larger drop off.

The reasons given for circumcision don't go away over time-- so what explains the dropoff? THERE you may find the reason for the surge in the first place.

As I thought it through, it suddenly dawned on me that sheets of skin can now be grown. It may be that foreskin of babies contains stem cells-- and that circumcisions were made routine as ORGAN HARVESTING for skin transplant centeres for burn victims. This would explain the current dropoff-- in that skin can now be genetically grown in test tubes-- putting less pressure on male infants in that regard.

Voila.

I'll take this theory to the online anti-circumcision sites and see if it flies. It may very well be that I already read about this somehwere and was so horrified that I put it out of my mind-- so that it's only now surfacing again-- after several years of subconcious processing and internet viewing of online pictures and videowhere the foreskin is intact. It's quite obvious when you view these materials that the foreskin is functional and that it's removal basically destroys normal sex functions of males. We live in the Dark Ages after all.